Stereotyping
I listened
to the radio the other day (like you do!), Jeremy Vine had his usual discussion
topic on Radio 2 and there were two very pompous sounding individuals
discussing (arguing) the topical case of the Tory chief Whip swearing at two
policemen. No for those of you who may not know who or what a chief whip is let
me elucidate. The chief whip keeps the party in line. That’s it really, not
much more to it and I suppose the clue is in the title (although no actual
whipping is involved although that would make British politics much more
interesting.
The issue for
discussion was that he was a cyclist using the motor vehicle exit of parliament
and the two individuals on the show used it as a soapbox to either defend or
attack cyclists.
The
discussion ranged back and forth between the two, one defending the cyclists
right to use the road and the other denigrating cyclists as rude and obnoxious
however that isn’t really the point I wish to make. The interesting thing which
kept me listening was the subject of stereotypes and groupings. Both guests on
the show were happy to lump whole sections of the populace into two camps -
cyclists and non cyclists and then make broad statements about their
behaviours. I believe (I may be wrong) that a large proportion of the listening
audience would find themselves siding with one or the other and thus
reinforcing the stereotype (even I'm stereotyping there with my assumption).
So is
stereotyping wrong. Are you doing an individual a disservice and therefore
discriminating if you stereotype them. Do you find yourself stereotyping people
and if so how does it make you feel. Well seeing as this is my blog I’ll tell
you all about what I think.
Stereotyping
is a good thing.
Hmm maybe I
should clarify. Stereotyping is a good thing as long as you know you are doing
it and also why. I stereotype based on my past experiences, things that I have
learned and things that I see (appearance, behaviour etc). I do this to allow
me to be prepared to deal with a given situation; whether that be work based or
socially. It means I am prepared to respond should the need arise or to avoid
contact/interaction. Now the important thing that I need to do, and this is
something that I have to consciously do is to react to the stereotype should it
be wrong. For instance in my job I have to interact with a wide range of people
with different social backgrounds, levels of learning and ethnicity. On contact
I have about 15 seconds to adapt to the individual(s) to ensure I communicate
effectively. In a previous role I had to routinely interact with board
directors and shop floor workers in the factory and there were clear
differences in effective communication (and both stereotypes were important to
the business of the organisation in different ways).
So back to
the first paragraph. A national radio show had two guests that stereotyped
whole sections of the UK
population on just a single attribute - cycling. And then proceeded to
denigrate or defend them irrespective of any other attribute. So maybe I’m
wrong and stereotyping is a bad thing. Or maybe media is about money and the
discussion wouldn’t have made good radio if the two guests made informed and
reasonable comments and therefore maybe the masses (you and me) wouldn’t listen
and therefore generate their funds.
Hmm, did I
just stereotype media?
Comments